The question everyone is asking: Is call of duty MW3 a $70 DLC? But does it matter?

#callofduty #gaming #shorts

22 Comments

  1. Hey here's an Idea !? How bout come up with a new storyline, characters, and make a brand new game and just not some redone games from over 10 years ago .

  2. I like paying for dlc tbh it seems the more u pay the more time is spent on the maps and story/ Easter eggs

  3. They couldn’t even model Shepard after the original Shepard. Had to use Glenn morshower who was literally a whole other general altogether on MW2 on 360

  4. Y'all didn't just get reused maps from MWII but maps from MW2 remastered. Which is what now 6 years old that is clearly has been not only amputated from its remastered but also proven to be remastered again. As there are still geometry bugs in MWIII's maps that clearly point towards the entire map needing to upscaled to fit MWIII's larger operator models. Essentially you all got twice now regurgitated MWII maps with MWIII branding.

    AND it all got sold to you as a standalone games pricing. MWIII went from potentially ground breaking to thee most copy and pasted game development in the history of gaming. As even the MWIII campaign are clearly just one off parts of warzone 1.0's verdansk maps repackaged into a campaign.

    And my personal opinion who has avoided this clearly scam of a game is MWIII is 1/10 material. I am ashamed for the SHG devs for making this. I don't even think a SHG dev can even use this game as a part of their game dev portfolio to get into another studio its so bad.

    Like you'd get taken aside pre interview and get asked if this is some kind of bad joke. XD. As MWIII has almost zero originality its all just bifercated copy and pasted. An intern could have made MWIII level of just embarrassing.

  5. Are you going to talk about call of duty’s ww2 games or does no one give a shit the ww2 call of duty games are to me the best

Write A Comment